How Long To Get Omeprazole Out Of Your System

Livin 'la vida loca

H t is time I read an opinion, I do not remember if it was the typical "letter to the editor" of a newspaper or a blog post, not the meeting, which reflects certain beliefs fairly widespread social and with whom, how could it be otherwise, I disagree. The reasoning came to be that to be mature and clear thinking when we come to 30-35 years, we have done the fool and have committed the most errors, follies and excesses at 20, because the more experience you had and more things are known, we will have clearer after what they want and what we do not want in life. "I feel that if I do now I will not ever" Youth is a fairly widespread belief. What they can not figure out is if they regret having made those mistakes.

I calls attention to such excesses that many people refer to as "enjoy life." The idea is to also be that if you do not "enjoy life" of young people, we will not ever because after have to "settle down." In my opinion, here are driving a few pre-established social beliefs far from encouraging. It is as if there were internal feeling that feeling like you enjoy life you have to commit abuses and excesses that will test even their health. But by this token, then all parents should be a bitter, with so many burdens and responsibilities. Personally, I find it very sad that "fun" means delirious excesses and abuses and unchecked. Nobody says that there is not a little crazy, I've drunk a bottle once and done, but if we do not set any rational limit the consequences can be dire. In addition, may have lived many different experiences you should have an overall knowledge over the years will make it easier to identify what they want, but what price we paid for doing things this way? For example, a person used to do as he pleases at all times (it seems that is what people mean by "enjoy life", which otherwise shows the dangerous level of hedonism to we are coming), it is likely that rather know little or nothing about "decision making", an exercise that takes a lifetime to be refined.

seems we want the reward at the beginning, without having done anything to deserve it. It is thought which must be exploited to do now all the crazy things happen to us because then comes the bad. Teach us to see that the reward comes at the end, after planting, and not the beginning and to see that the excesses do not have to do with fun or mature or "settle down" with being embarrassed, is an urgent task and responsibility of all parents and educators.

Furthermore, the reasoning "far exceeded all to know what you want in the future" just shows, if anything, a possible way to achieve this goal is the clarity of ideas, but it is neither possible nor the only way I seems the most healthy. And when I say that I disagree with this reasoning is not because si tuviera una relación con una persona joven y asumiera este planteamiento tendría que cortar diciendo: "Mira, tenemos que dejarlo porque aún eres muy joven y tienes mucho que explorar antes de decidir si quieres estar conmigo"; sino porque yo también tuve 20 años y cuando tenía 20 años no pensaba así y no cometí esos abusos ni adquirí todas esas experiencias de la vida, y a pesar de ello no me ha hecho falta llegar a los 35 ni a los 30, ya con 25 tenía bastante claro qué quería en la vida y qué no quería (al menos a nivel personal, que es de lo que hablo). Ergo hay más vías posibles para alcanzar la "iluminación" que el camino de Dionisos (el dios más vago de todo el Olimpo, by the way). "I'm bored because I druggie nor frequent brothels (including service clubs) or because I do not easily lend itself to transactions meat? Be. I personally am very satisfied and proud of my life. I enjoy my way and those other ways that I did not happen either. Everyone is everyone, that's for sure, but after complaints come not suffering fools, but serious, that could have been avoided had done things differently.

I do not want when you have 35 years and finally you know what you want because you have tried all kinds of good and bad experiences, discover it what you want you have lost it long ago and can not recover, and all for making the asshole.

And do not say these words with resentment because I am not going or have gone through an experience that moves me to want to unburden myself in this regard. It's just my theoretical opinion on the matter. I have done things differently and I got the same result as allegedly being pursued: to keep things clear, therefore, or am I an exception or an example of how things can be done otherwise.

Sour Stomach And Black Stool

(Click to enlarge)

Unterschied Emu Bronte Und Emu Wool

Blackmail Football is the people's coca FIMP

P or mysteries life, my genetic makeup has not called me in the way of football in my hobbies. I do not like. But it's a love-me-not in absolute, not relative, because there are two types of people who "do not like football": those who dislike or indifference causes them, except when you play a team that they identify the reason (family influence, patriotism, etc), and they do not really like, with all the consequences, play who you play. Those of the second type are, I suspect, an endangered species. I have not seen a single football match in my life. While playing the English these days I played Heroes of Might & Magic V.

at school and institute, when the physical education teacher was generous day, could have the "detail" to send us to play a football match, in the belief that really excite us all. Those days for me were nightmares. I was 1% would have voted against it. Sometimes they offered us no alternative. These days I used to use it and almost always ended up playing badminton with the girls. For me it went infinitely better. The only trick was to find a girl with a coordination minimally acceptable, but good, the bad ... In general I have always been more of racket ball for these things.

However, my case is a bit unusual, because I'm almost at the opposite end. Not only do not like football, but sometimes depending on mood, it can bother. I still say more to irritate me. It is an automatic emotional response that I live occasionally, in years past than at present. Maybe it has something to do with the set of specific circumstances and somewhat atypical in sport, usually football around the world. Why this sport generates so much aggression in people? Why these cries and several scandals when game day? One passes in front of a bar when someone dials a goal and the collective roar is deafening. And yes, it is sociology that explains why mass behavior involving a spread of attitudes, but I do not why this happens individually. One is in the privacy of your home, away from social contagion, and you can scream. I speak from experience as a neighbor.

Why this does not happen with other sports? It is not customary shouting curses and cries creative when a player loses the advantage or sends two consecutive aces to the network. And so I say that football is the coca of people, not opium, as Marx suggested, because the opium is depressing, but because football excitement, so I think that a drug stimulant and depressant not be better. It is true that does not alter the original meaning, as Marx meant to imply that football is the easiest way to access people's pleasure and happiness after a hard day's work, and as such retains its meaning. Shouting

unreasonably always seemed uncivilized, but also may have something to do with the fact that I am a quiet person to disgust. The other situation in which it is curious how many people also lose some papers of decorum is driving. Peaceful and normal people, who never say a word higher than another, leading professors suddenly become the expletive.

And the amount of money that moves the football business? Despicable. The clubs are laughing at the crisis in the face. We can not have been such a disparity in wages. I can not get into his head that could claim millions and millions just to start running after a ball, basically to entertain yourself and others. And the hard workers of all life difficulties to make ends meet.

In summary, I accept that everyone has their tastes. I do not mind who likes football, although I wonder the reason for the imbalance, because I believe that football beats other sports with overwhelming majority. Maybe just tradition, custom? Like other sports are perceived as more elitist, representing football "sport of the people" of all time? I am bothered by the characteristics that often accompany it.

Wheybolic Extreme 60 Stack

Gijon 2010 (II): Science and network

S eguimos. Following the table held skepticism of science and network with those responsible for Siemens Siemens Siemens Science , Microserfs , Physics in Science Fiction and Yoriento , with the director of the magazine QUO and head of product and muyinteresante.es geo.es world, moderated by the head of Fogonazos . Whose content saved a chat closely related to the previous table happened to share with you.

World plant and digital world

expressed in these terms Jorge Alcalde, director of the magazine Quo, who believed that means "plant world", referring to the contents printed on paper, the world of cellulose should not be perceived as a dichotomy of old media versus new media, but, in his words, "there are old ways of doing things and new ways of doing things," expressing the general idea that the role and network are simply means different premise also defended by Noel Dueñas, product manager of two known digital magazines, who explained that the content printed on paper can not move without the digital medium because it simply does not work. They are different products require different treatment. Thus began a small war media Live where bloggers like Manuel Herman, Siemens Siemens Siemens Science, suggested the existence of a special complexity in the issue of disclosure of environmental science when speaker is in itself a business , which requires recognition of commercial interests involved, which may adversely affect the "transparency" (the word given by Alfonso Alcantara, Yoriento) content. Manuel Herman used the word "popularization" to refer to media reporting of payment, a term that sparked immediate protest of the guests involved. In particular, Noelia Dueñas complained about the negative connotations of the term as if he were speaking from an elitist superiority plane where you have to teach the ignorant. However no one doubted the importance of bringing science to the world and all expressed their hope that this happens and its rejection of the idea that science is elitist. Personally, I agree with the guests about the noble and laudable intention of bringing science to everyone, but I like to point out the need to ask at what price? For if to sell and science reach the people, we must distort it, even just a little, we already paying a fairly high price. This distortion has to do with a thing called sensationalism, word was not mentioned specifically but I suspect it is closer to what actually was thinking Herman, thinking that "popularity" was his way of easing. But hey, no blood came to river.


burned the powers!

A survey intended to probe the interest of science for the people of the street, pointed out that, on average, more interested in sport science, and specifically on the latter stated percentages take into account the answers "I do not understand" and "Not interested" facts to which he could not help shocked Sergio L. Palacios, a physics professor and head of Physics at the Science Fiction, which is both a blog and a course designed by him who teaches at the university and raised open to all races, both of letters and science, distinction that in his view seems absurd because a person must be fully trained and being educated should assume to know all areas of knowledge in general. He also criticized the apathy of most teachers of all subjects, briefly exposing the dismal educational scenario university, which led to a general critique of the educational system and at the same Palacios, in a moment of passion, to exclaim: "We burned the powers!". Also lamented the absurdity of a computer class in high schools, explaining that the Computer is only a tool, as such, should be integrated into all classes. "Imagine a kind of pencil," he said ironically on the subject. We can say that he preaches, for in their subject is integrated informatics and some proposed activities are digital. Missing



models also was noted, referring to the survey I opened the table, the possible distortion in favorable responses like "I'm interested in science," pointing to a possible factor in the matter of ethics. And to say that science does not matter, today, is ugly, is ethically wrong, so they say otherwise, but do not think to look good. In what came to match all the guests is in the idea that the main problem is that people see science as something foreign, something strange, like a world apart, a perception which contributes over films and other products perpetuating the distorted image of "mad scientist" or, more recently, the "silly science", referring to Flipy character, programs like "ant." Mauritius, The Return of charlatans, and was commissioned in his day he . There were also criticisms Punset, whom Herman ruled that, for him, the mistakes he has committed blunders and forever nullify all the good that you could have done. With references like these can not complain about lack of interest. Young people are missing models.

I recall that on the official website of the forum more information on these and other content.

And with that and a biscuit ...

<< Gijón FIMP 2010 (I): Escepticismo y ciencia en Internet

Can Gonorrhea Remain Dormant For Years

Gijón FIMP 2010 (I): Skepticism and Science in Internet

E hese days held in Gijón the third edition of Meeting Point Internet Eset, a Spaniard annual forum organized by bringing together elcomerciodigital.com known bloggers and publishers of digital content to discuss various issues with the Internet as a backdrop. Today in particular have taken place two panels of the most interesting: "Critical thinking, skepticism and science", which talk about today, we brought together the heads of the village irreducible , Magonia and Return of charlatans , moderated by the Maikelnai's blog , and "Science and network", which will discuss the next day, which are the two events Forum to attend as I was interested in public and I will share with you the impressions I had.

The official website of the forum, see the complete program and read brief articles that reflected the main content of the talks, and even see them live. The truth is that I've enjoyed it. Have been some interesting talks, entertaining and fun. The relaxed and casual, good cheer and humor. Time has passed fairly quickly. Hotel amenities which reflected the event, very cool and comfortable. The venue was not completed by any means, but we were not few. Touch phones, laptops and netbooks on the tables of a few assistants, and some other ipad, live twittering the event, whose contents come from a review without further delay.

Science Fiction and skepticism

The first question that the moderator wanted to deal with the guests was that told a little about what their experiences had led to the development of critical and skeptical, to which all seemed to have one thing in common: the attraction of science fiction. All young people started taking great interest in various topics addressed by science fiction, a common pattern and quite interesting in itself. Scifi has always had that natural hook that fascinates because outside of the special effects and better or worse success in using science, creative play with possibilities for being different from the known poses interesting thoughts, get easily and almost without trying to make us think. This is in my opinion the great merit of scifi and perhaps is responsible for many skeptics and critics who like to know how the world see in it an attractive vehicle for meeting those needs. Although scifi is, of course, that and more. Moreover, all also began feeling attracted to a pseudo-issue, which was initially approached with sound ingenuity that wants to unravel the mysteries of the unknown and fascinating research. Thus, many critics are aware of the skepticism start as gullible, are interested in a topic while investigating for details on the sole interest of exploring a possible new field of knowledge, they take the great disappointment of the lack of tests, the data manipulated and outright deceptions. And is not that scientists are against aliens visiting us, as pointed Luis Alfonso Gámez of Magonia, because what greater pleasure could be for them, as scientists, that this was true. We would like to believe so, we are wanting. The possibilities for exploration of new knowledge would be immense. Responsible for Magonia also said, apropos of pseudoscience, that there are areas that are attractive in themselves, like the pyramids, aliens who do not need to draw attention, and that kind of cuesiones should be harnessed to adequately inform, and you can do cool things with real content and true, simply because the issues are unmodified. Also alluded to the importance of critical thinking as a tool to use just to make sure they are cheating us. One of the guests used as a metaphor explaining the act of buying a second hand car, where before you buy we make some checks, such as the engine look a little kick or hit four wheels, as an example of critical thinking. If we use for it, use it also for the rest. Check things out, we did not create them just because, cuestionémoslas.


recruitment strategies

Another question inquired was the moderator of the type of audience that wanted to reach bloggers and the more general question of how to bring critical thinking to the whole world . Here there were two strategies different. Mauricio Schwarz, The Return of charlatans, favored a direct and aggressive critical style, which is why some readers attributed rather abruptly in his texts. This has the disadvantage of being a journalist rather limited to the circle of those who are sympathetic to their ideas, so that a direct and negative title as "The Power Balance is a scam" and by itself will make those who believe it does not tempted to read the article. It is a psychological issue. People do not like being told they're wrong. Direct denials cause a negative psychological impact of a sudden, as I commented perceptively Dale Carnegie in How to friends and influence people , who suggested a little more tact in these matters. Perhaps that is why Javier Peláez, irreducible village uses a different strategy. He proposes, in his words, the use of misleading titles, and joked with the famous bracelet explaining that instead of "The Power Balance does not work", he titled "The Power Balance makes theirs", so that to the gullible who have bought are attracted or tempted to read the content, which increases the chances of that report back. I take communion more with this second view. If we want to reach everyone, including the gullible, if we have the possibility to "convert" to the "infidels" have to be smarter than them, use psychology, that it is. Have not used by advertisers to encourage us to eat? As disseminators should have no more scruples.

abuse of scientists on television

The issue of scientific and critical thinkers as partners in television, both debates as sections, also had its place in this discussion. The guest explained how many scientists were invited to programs that had nothing to do with the issue that supposedly were going to try, suddenly found himself in embarrassing situations with a feeling almost shameful not to paint anything there, and we all remember the "I've come to talk about my book, and understood a little better how bad could one feel cheated if carried to a television program. Many interventions also distort visiting scientist, out of context or using them for the benefit of the program itself, using the halo of prestige that surrounds the real science to force the guarantor of the pseudoscience offered. It also mentioned some tricks of these magazines: photo montages or custom-made computer graphics to media studies for use as evidence in the contents of their magazines or documentaries uncovered by critical that personal contacts with the study in question confirms the authorship of the commission, and therefore, misleading, and concealed then after the publication of the critic and the subsequent refusal of journals and studies to make statements to regard. In this item I would also remember the words of denunciation who wrote the psychologist Pilar Varela relating to poor staging that scientists often have as guests on TV, compared to sellers of smoke, seasoned real showmen in the art of getting to their audience through the use of the word as a weapon, not really, but of authority. Another strategy magufa very fashionable lately, is to change the terms of lifelong science-sounding jargon without being, creating a greater impact on people. Louis, Magonia, gave as an example the recent change in terminology has been the EVP lifetime, a word that was not serious and was taken to laughter even among non-critical, the most instrumental modeln transcommunication buzzword , which of course, is thinner and more serious as it seems.

works for me!

The great psychological trap the gullible. The "works for me." The output of all fears the most critical listen as the argument to the least can do. Self-deception where the same individual who gives all power to the belief in making erroneous attributions. Superstition combines with the other great classic "injury is not going to do." And so we have more than half the population being some kind of red clothing on New Years Eve. Some because they believe it brings good luck. Others just in case, total damage is not going to do. It is also interesting to see how the human mind when it unveils a scam. The subject automatically finds another way to justify the investment to feel better, and so we have people who have acquired miraculous bracelets and finally become convinced that it does not work, reacting with a "good, is cool." I know someone who invested a considerable sum of money in one of those new vibrating platforms that only vibrate but that promise weight loss and muscle toning. I managed to convince her that it is impossible to serve for that purpose, and we looked for reasons cited by Internet. His reaction was: "Oh ... Well, at least the sessions relaxed and let me sleep better." It is found that "the consoles is not because they want."

The strength of belief

But a magazine or a person to deny the facts of which he is accused is not the worst and saddest que puede suceder. Lo más triste que puede suceder y que de hecho sucede es cuando el medio difusor del bulo reconoce públicamente la estafa y, pese a ello, quienes se lo habían creído niegan entonces la validez de la confesión y se reafirman en la creencia del engaño. Y es que la estupidez humana a veces parece no tener límites. Y hablando de creencias les dio tiempo a los invitados a mencionar la Psicología cognitiva y la inmensa cantidad de maneras que tenemos de engañarnos a nosotros mismos, sobre lo cual los invitados nos pusieron algunos ejemplos prácticos divertidos de los que participamos todos los asistentes en vivo y en directo. Con Mauricio vimos manipulaciones de imágenes para convertir casi cualquier cosa en un elemento parapsychology, and Luis Alfonso Gámez saw a couple of Pareidolia , including the famous pareidolia sound of the song "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin, who like me did not know, I discovered in real time at the moment and I was stunned. It was also noted that although we have psychology as mental schemes that favor the irrational belief because our brain is also a heuristic to solve problems not necessarily appeal to reason, if only for reasons of efficiency (I add), however the people distinguish very well between fantasy and reality, and concludes that the problem is mainly that most people have no alternative data (and often conflicting, I also add) that given the means to those who have regular contact, with all this more a matter of misinformation than anything else, which leads to problem of education and responsibility of the media, issues have been addressed at the next lecture and we will discuss the next day.

FIMP Gijón 2010 (II): Science and network>>