Clear Liquid Gush Discharge

Psychologists also go to the psychologist

A times is cause for harsh criticism on the idea that professional psychologists can have personal problems. "If you can not handle their children not to give me advice on how to educate mine" and other similar content are the same or different arguments I have heard in some other occasion. In other words, if a psychologist is a child dies, theoretically should not affect you. Or, if a psychologist has children, is without doubt an exceptional father and his children never ever have personal problems. These and other misconceptions about the issue must be urgently dismantled.

The idea that psychologists should be immune to the problems strikes me as absurd for the following reason. In the same way that doctors are not invulnerable to disease by the mere fact that doctors and know much about them, and psychologists are not invulnerable to personal problems by the mere fact that psychologists and know a lot about human thought. And trust in doctors. In my opinion, psychologists simply due course, will mean more resources to handle the situation, to address the problem, increasing the odds to overcome more or less efficiently. And like doctors in their field, greater knowledge of the areas under study, may better predict and prevent potential problems most commonly occur in these areas. Resources all these men, because it must be said, does not necessarily have to possess exclusively psychologists. And in this sense, the figure of the friend-psychologist is not inconsistent, and that also goes with the personality. Simply, in my view, psychology is the most efficient way to access knowledge or to be able to develop some personal skills, but, of course, is not unique. Moreover, the fact that people with these skills are specialized in dealing with people with personal problems, also let them know, if only by sheer statistics, how things usually work and what not.

state otherwise of the arguments above imply that doctors and psychologists have full control over the circumstances that may move them to suffer an illness or personal problems, which is impossible. But it can be extrapolated to any field: a computer will never have trouble handling a computer? "A mathematician is never wrong doing accounts? Do not confuse the words counseling and omniscience.

I think it also influences a little personality on this issue. There are so conceited or obtuse that directly reject any comment on, to follow the same example, the education of their children unless they are from parents who have no problems with theirs. I think it's a double package error. On one side is an error of intent, because I think of what it is to build together a good position to do things, and in this respect may be very valid ideas where it comes from. Good advice is good advice whether you give the pope as if he gives the baker or a beggar. To agree with these people almost equivalent to consider that parents are, for the mere fact of being, infallible, and that those who are not parents can never have good ideas on the subject, as all parents know that There are good and very bad, with all intermediate possibilities. Do not act without some logic, however in its reasoning to assume that only people who are in the same situation, or as close as possible, are the only ones who can understand them completely. But not necessarily have to be so and that too is a mistake of knowledge (or rather ignorance). It has to do with the established belief that only personal experience on a particular subject can be taken as an accreditation only on the validity of the arguments put forward in this regard. In other words, the talk has to do always "experience" and if not should shut up because then "do not know what he's talking." Beliefs, in my opinion, as common as stupid. All People are different, their abilities and skills may well be different, and not all do the same in the same situations, so then the real difference is not in the act of passing or not the experience in question, but the fact to be a different person. I agree that "experience is a degree", as I hear, but personally I think you have to analyze is the possible validity of the idea offered, without judging, without filtering it through a sieve of prejudice, without the obscured the executioner beheads feeling: "You do not know what I'm going, so shut up." Because your skin is. But never will be. Can not is a different person. In this context, "experience is the mother of science" is being misinterpreted. In this wise saying, the word science refers to knowledge of a person and not the science of the scientists and their experiments to validate their theories. It is a philosophical, not scientific. It simply means that the situations we are going to the length and breadth of life we \u200b\u200bare shaping in one way or the other, determining what we think and know things, something that I think modern psychology is, in general, strongly agree.

In a interview with the psychologist Pilar Varela few years ago, was asked if psychologists also go to the psychologist, to which he replied simply with a sincere and resounding "Yes, of course." Although the sheer spontaneity of the response and says enough, the truth is I miss the professionals themselves, or at least engaged in the publication, is given more to learn about themselves as human beings with problems like everyone world, helping to demystify a little mental supermen image many people have about them. Because neither are supermen or have supernatural powers or extrasensory whatsoever. Are poor mortals like everyone else, doctors included, simple people who ask for advice in a given time, exactly as would a computer if we want to buy a computer, or a butcher if you hesitate between lamb chops or veal. And there's more.

Of course, all this is just my humble opinion, one of the many possible.

Tailor For Sari Blouses

What do we tire

S lways had believed that intellectual activity exhausted much or more than physical, an idea that was tested empirically in my years of higher academic activity, especially in exams. I remember that after only two or three hours of discussion had completely crippled, I hurt all over, I felt as tired as if he had been carrying cement bags all morning. But recently I've met by indirect means some facts that had never considered, which may explain the depletion blamed on mental effort, but actually have nothing to do with him.

Dale Carnegie includes several interesting details on the subject in his essay "How to Stop Worrying , where I draw that I found most relevant. The idea is that, in principle, the mental work alone can not we get tired. A few years ago scientists tried to figure out how long the human brain can work without coming to this "reduced capacity for work" we call fatigue and found that blood passing through the brain, when is active, shows no sign of it. As far as the brain, it seems that it can work so well and so quickly after several hours hours as before. But if the brain is tireless, then what do we get tired?

Psychiatrists say that most of our fatigue comes from our mental and emotional attitudes. One of the most distinguished psychiatrists in England, JA Hadfield, says in his book that "most of the fatigue we suffer mental in origin, in fact, depletion of purely physical origin is rare." One of the most distinguished psychiatrists in the United States, AA Brill, goes further. Says: "One hundred percent the sedentary worker fatigue in good health due to psychological factors, understood as the emotional factors. "

Boredom, resentment, feeling that we are not appreciated, a sense of futility, hurry, anxiety, concern ... These are the emotional factors that exhaust the sedentary worker, making it susceptible to catching colds, reducing its output and send it home with nervous headaches. Yes, we get tired because our emotions produce nervous tension in the body. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company said this in a booklet on fatigue. This major insurance company says: "Hard work rarely causes fatigue itself can not be cured by a good sleep or rest ... Worry, stress and emotional disturbances are three major causes of fatigue . Often they are at fault when the cause seems to be the physical or mental labor ... Remember that a tense muscle is a muscle that works. Loosen the tension! Save energy for important duties. "

Remember that a tense muscle is a muscle that works . Very successful. I had not fallen in the amount of postural habits that we adopt as we work to realize that without being forced to a muscle be in tension. This poor postural habits may be due to awkward postures simply by misuse or distribution of resources and the workspace, or they can be emotional factors mentioned above which also inadvertently, needlessly activate a muscle. In the end, the emotional stress resulting in muscle tension. Or perhaps:

Why produce these unnecessary stress when performing mental work? Daniel W. Josselyn says: "I think the main obstacle is the almost universal belief that hard work requires a sense of effort to be well done." That is the reason that frown when we focus, de que echemos los hombros hacia delante. Pedimos a nuestros músculos que realicen los movimientos del esfuerzo, algo que no ayuda en nada al trabajo del cerebro .

Y para relajarnos, entonces, ¿cómo se hace? ¿empieza con la mente? No, empieza con los músculos. Parece ser que lo que debemos relajar son los músculos, aunque el hecho de que ello sea un proceso consciente y voluntario no excluye del todo un cierto componente mental. Otro detalle interesante relacionado con esto es que de todas las partes del cuerpo que podemos relajar, los ojos tienen más importancia de la que parece.

(...) Puede hacer lo mismo con la mandíbula, los músculos del rostro, el cuello, shoulders and whole body. But the most important body is the eye. Dr. Edmund Jacobson of the University of Chicago, has been said that if one is able to fully relax the muscles of the eyes, may well forget all your anxieties. The reason that the eyes are so important to relieve stress is to burn a quarter of all energy consumed by the body nerve . This is also, secondly, the reason that many people with perfect vision suffer from "sight". Is that they are subjecting your eyes to strain.

Relaxing in his spare time, working in a comfortable position as possible ( tensiones del cuerpo producen dolores en hombros y espalda y fatiga nerviosa) y auto-observarse de vez en cuando, preguntándose si lo está haciendo bien o si por el contrario está empleando músculos que no tienen nada que ver con el trabajo que está realizando, son unas sencillas indicaciones con las que el autor cierra el breve capítulo que dedica al tema en cuestión.

Relájese a ratos perdidos. Deje que su cuerpo quede tan fláccido como un viejo calcetín. Tengo un viejo calcetín de color marrón sobre mi escritorio mientras trabajo, como recordatorio de lo relajado que debería estar. Si no tiene un calcetín, un gato servirá. ¿Ha cogido alguna vez a un gatito que haya estado tomando the sun? The two ends of the body hanging like a wet newspaper. Even the yogis of India say that if you want to master the art of relaxation, study the cat. I've never seen a tired cat, a cat with a cat nervous breakdown or suffering from insomnia, worry or stomach ulcers ...

Creative Title For Eating Disorder Essay

eroticism in music videos

M and enjoy watching music videos. Some are very creative. I am a very visual person, I seduce your images and this can be profitably used as a vehicle to access and enjoy the music more easily. The problem, and complained today is when we abuse this interesting tool manipulating minds through the easy recourse of eroticism, just as happens in advertising. And in Marketing can be very original in the creation of ads, but most do not leave the idea of \u200b\u200beroticism and provocation. And it almost seems that if there comes a busty hack does not sell that product. We all know that sex sells, it sells because it appeals to the most basic biological instincts of human beings, and being aware of it does not negate the good feeling of seeing a beautiful body.

Neuroscience in the service of advertising. What a danger! Gradually, scientists are discovering how our minds work, how we process things in the brain, how we think, how we relate things, etc, and the great danger is that this information may use advertisers to psychologically manipulate us and lead us like a flock of sheep, to perpetuate old patterns of consumerism which talked a bit the other day .

I sometimes I find myself dumbfounded when I'm half watching a video clip of a famous young singer. Seems we always have to "be good", leaving scantily clad and dancing provocatively. And when he finally reacted a little ashamed of having made me fall into the trap again. The other day I was asked: - Is the song you like because it goes so and because you like the song itself? - A silly and foolish it seemed like a very interesting question to ponder on in psychological terms. But why is, how? By association of stimuli and maybe some conditioning. It's actually a very old trick well known to working with NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) because some of the techniques they use are based a bit on the same. Our memory stores

aspects every way. Not only recall images we can recognize as familiar sounds, smells, and inner feelings. But all these aspects are more or less integrated into the memories and it may take a picture remind us of a sound, a sound that makes us remember a feeling, etc. A nice image makes the music that accompanies "the better", especially if it is also a simple and melodic structure, those to which our ears are more accustomed to hearing. Perhaps the pleasant stimulus makes our mind associate with each other and extend that sense of affinity to the elements that accompany you into believing that we like the song when perhaps a review could be distorted by manipulation of the senses, so to speak way.

musicologist friend of mine asked one day when we chatted the subject in a cafe which would not stop television broadcast music videos of the features discussed above, if when we're watching the video we really appreciate the musical work itself, while music, but our attention is diverted to the cleavage and buttocks of the women thus compromising our ability to analyze objectively and impartially. Moreover, if we remove all those elements, if we remove the chick or chavalas wagging their pleasures, what is your music? I found an interesting observation.

marketing service in the service of music consumption.

Windows 7 Roller Coaster Tycoon 3, Runtime Error

The devaluation of culture in consumer society

C hen we think of consumerism, the image can come to us more readily to mind is that of a mall filled with all kinds of products waiting to be acquired by us. In the hypocrisy that characterizes the man many are aware of the many items they buy unnecessary and have no problem openly acknowledge. However, not all unnecessary consumer products are the same and it looks like a special halo justification for the excessive consumption of products considered "cultural", under the motto "if culture is good." No need to buy compulsively pots and pans, that's wasteful, but if it's books and records other history, that is commendable. And is that even something as seemingly noble and elevated as "culture" also has become business, materialized in objects that can be acquired, not necessarily valued. How did we fall so low?

this topic I was talking the other day with a musicologist friend who told me how, in some circles by moving, and obviously in particular in relation to the music market, not to see potential customers that seem to give more value to the physical act of purchasing records, that musical works themselves. In the forums music by moving, there is a competition to see who gets greater number of records, who is the most difficult to get the best price possible. Interesting thread in principle on what records are being heard or have been purchased, they become an endless list of "trophies" that are displayed as in a personal exposure (or even a museum, because there is a museum for personal satisfaction of those who lost), leaving the thread empty of all content.

The same applies to other sectors, where special packages of films, limited editions, trilogies in tins estate, are incessant complaint calls to acquire thousands of people to see once and then show them off on the shelf. One might think that with this Internet video stores are losing a lot of money and customers, as there is the possibility that a particular download a movie instead of renting, however, paradoxically, many prefer to buy it. A few years ago I spoke with the owner of a video of Salamanca protesting a bit about this issue, and rebelled at the idea of \u200b\u200brent prices down wondering how many passes there then give a film to amortize the cost of acquisition , bearing in mind that the more passes you give, the more can go wrong (customers are treated right things rather small). And not without reason. Well, interestingly, paid 30 euros for buying a movie that will not be so many times to consider the amortized cost, rather than rent it each time you want to see it. But there is this kind of "fever of private property" in which it is desirable to have things and it is desirable to have them on loan.

The most obvious evidence and direct result of consumerism, I always say, are the "lumber." Sure you could do a study and found a direct relationship between the amount of stuff stored and the degree of unnecessary use of its owner. And watch, I am the first to admit that I have packs of tins movies and special editions of movies "cult." And yes, some may be good idea to have them because I might see them many times, but all or joke.

Turning to cultural, and finally, it seems that large amounts of money spent on cultural issues may be a small defect, but as culture, is a healthy habit. But the question is: to what extent we are not too degraded or even emptied of all content to their own culture by making it mere physical acts of transaction? Who would say that, apparently, and not beyond, expect to be more cultivated, which has its own library full of hundreds of books purchased, or having just one or two?